Investments

Readers of this blog will have noted my fascination with Warren Buffett and not least so lately in such dire times of market collapses and faltering economies.

I came across this brilliant article  on Fool.com (The Motley Fool  as they are known remains one of my favourite financial sites and blogs), written by Anand Chokkavelu who intelligently questions Mr Buffett’s decisions and investment sanity of late.

Here follows some of the highlights from the same article  which puts Buffett’s investment strategies and future in perspective :

Anand starts by asking provocative questions about Buffett’s acumen of late :

Has Warren Buffett just been lucky all these years? 

It feels like sacrilege, but in light of recent events, I have to ask the question. After all …

• His company, Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE: BRK-A) (NYSE: BRK-B), has reported $10 billion in writedowns on its equity put options — i.e., derivatives.
• His hefty positions in financial stocks, including Wells Fargo (NYSE: WFC), US Bancorp, and American Express (NYSE: AXP), have been absolutely throttled in this banking crisis.
• He loaded up on shares of oil titan ConocoPhillips at the height of the oil bubble last summer — a mistake for which he expresses regret in his letter to shareholders.

I’m not the only one questioning the Oracle of Omaha’s investing prowess. One of the ratings agencies took away Berkshire’s pristine AAA debt rating. The price of Berkshire credit-default swaps (which are basically insurance against Berkshire defaulting) is at levels more usually found with companies rated as junk. And finally, shares of Buffett’s holding company are trading at half of last fall’s prices.

Anand then goes on to ask the vital question of whether Buffett has just been extremely lucky through major risk-taking over the decades, or whether in fact he is sticking by his famous strategy that has made him one of the world’s most renowned investors and accumulators of capital :

Buffett’s entrance into derivatives, which he famously described as “financial weapons of mass destruction, carrying dangers that, while now latent, are potentially lethal,” might lead you to believe he’s both hypocritical and risk-happy.

After all, since he made that claim in 2002, Berkshire has participated in four types of derivatives contracts, including taking $4.9 billion to write $37.1 billion worth of equity put options.

Still, believe it or not, Buffett’s not being hypocritical, he’s not being overly risky, and he hasn’t made terrible deals.

Unlike many investors (and investment banks), he uses derivatives very carefully. In the equity puts, for example, Buffett has bet that stock markets in the U.S., Europe, and Japan won’t utterly collapse over the long term. He gets the $4.9 billion up front, and he has to pay up only if the markets are lower when the various contracts expire between 2019 and 2028. But under mark-to-market accounting, he has to record those bets as losses because of the short-term plunge of the worldwide stock markets.

Buffett prices and monitors each contract himself. There are certainly risks involved, but those risks aren’t as dramatic as they seem. In the case of the $37.1 billion in equity put exposure, world markets would have to fall to zero for Berkshire to pay out the full amount — and the markets have between a decade and two decades to make up the $10 billion in paper losses. In the meantime, Buffett gets to invest and grow the $4.9 billion in premiums.

OK so Anand concludes he is not lucky or especially risk prone considering market facts and history etc - but he then moves on to question his recorded bad investment decisions of 2008 which cost Berkshire Hathaway  billions :

The carnage so far this year has likely continued that drop in book value, but remember that investing in the stock of public companies is only one facet of Berkshire’s operations. It also includes the core insurance business (including GEICO and its reinsurance businesses), its other subsidiaries like its utilities and Dairy Queen, and Buffett’s aforementioned derivatives contracts.

Many of Buffett’s stock positions are much worse off than they were just months ago, but it’s worth noting that Berkshire’s own stock-price drop has more than priced in these missteps. Furthermore, Buffett has been doubted often in his nearly half-century at the helm of Berkshire Hathaway — you’ll recall the assertions during the tech bubble that Buffett’s investing style was obsolete — only to be proven right time and time again.

Even here Anand is Ok with what has happened and remains unconcerned about Buffett’s empire’s future on those grounds, however, he is concerned about two factors in Buffett’s portfolio - the first of these being his diversion into the reinsurance business :

The first is Berkshire’s reinsurance business. Quite simply, Buffett and his trusted associates are in the business of pricing catastrophic events, which feature “very large transactions, incredible speed of execution, and a willingness to quote on policies that leave others scratching their heads.”

Yes, Berkshire pools this risk and generates very attractive rates for it, but a few mistakes could blow the whole operation. Just like GE Capital has crippled General Electric (NYSE: GE), adverse events in Berkshire’s insurance operations could take down the whole conglomerate.

And the second hitting home even closer to many of us, namely Warren Buffett’s own mortality and undisputed role as head and brains of Berkshire Hathaway :

The second problem is that, contrary to the hype, Buffett is mortal. Even more so than Steve Jobs at Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL), Buffett is Berkshire Hathaway. It may not seem like it at these prices, but there is a considerable premium baked into Berkshire stock because he’s the one running it.

One of Anand’s conclusions to his article is not only that Buffett most likely remains the guru and oracle he has earned himself a name as, give and take, but that we as investors, private orinstitutional, must at all times question everything and everyone around us before we make major decisions investment wise, regardless of the status of the entity we are investing with (The Madoff scandal is another good example of that !) :

Buffett remains the greatest allocator of capital on this planet, and he’s getting some great opportunities thrown his way. Down-on-their-luck companies from Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS) to GE to Harley-Davidson have sought his financial help and reputation, at very, very favorable terms.

There is plenty of risk in Berkshire stock, but at current prices, I believe that Berkshire Hathaway is worth the risk. In fact, the recent price drops convinced me to put my money where my mouth is — I recently bought Berkshire Hathaway stock.

Read the full article here - it is worth it.

Equity Investment, Investment Company, Investment Fund, Investment Management Financial crisis, investment crisis, risk-taking, Warren Buffet

The long-awted letter to his Berkshire Hathaway Shareholders was released yesterday by billionaire Warren Buffet and he admits to having had a very bad 2008 with record losses and share value drops.

He is also convinced that 2009 is out the window given the disastrous state of the US and global economies but beyond that he is hesitant to predict the future - at least the immediate future.

Let us take a look at what his investor letter contained and where Mr Buffet sees it all heading.

MarketWatch quotes  Buffet from his letter with regards to future predictions :

We’re certain, for example, that the economy will be in shambles throughout 2009 — and, for that matter, probably well beyond — but that conclusion does not tell us whether the stock market will rise or fall,” Buffett wrote.

The article goes on to quote a brutally honest Buffett on his 2008 mistakes and bad investment choices and timings :

Buffett, known as the “Oracle of Omaha,” admitted to mistakes last year. “During 2008 I did some dumb things in investments,” he said. One such error, he said, was the purchase of a large amount of Conoco Phillips Inc. stock when oil and gas prices were nearing peak levels.

“I in no way anticipated the dramatic fall in energy prices that occurred in the last half of the year,” he said. “I still believe the odds are good that oil sells far higher in the future than the current $40-to-$50 price. But so far I have been dead wrong. Even if prices should rise, moreover, the terrible timing of my purchase has cost Berkshire several billion dollars.”

Buffett also said his acquisition of shares in two Irish banks have turned out badly — with losses of more than 89%.

On the positive side, the investor is pleased with buys totaling $14.5 million in fixed-income securities issued by General Electric Co.  and William Wrigley Co. “We very much like these commitments, which carry high current yields that, in themselves, make the investments more than satisfactory. But in each of these three purchases, we also acquired a substantial equity participation as a bonus.”

Equity Investment, Investment Company, Investment Fund, Investment Management, US Investments Berkshire Hathaway, ConocoPhillips, Hyper inflation, Investor news, US Economy, Warren Buffet

Less than a year ago Swiss banking giant UBS was considered by many the best bank in the world, certainly for its wealth management which was also the largest at the time, and its image and reputation were top notch amongst private clients as well as institutional and government entities.

Not so these days : Their combined losses in 2008 and beg 2009 have shaken the financial community and left many of their clients and investors much worse off than when they started out with the bank and their shares have been in a free fall from its peak around US$ 60+ to now around US$ 10.

Now the bank finds itself in the wrong kind of spotlight again now having been sued by none other than the US Government who wants the bank to immediately hand over the names and full details of all their US clients, estimated around 52,000, who allegedly hid their secret Swiss accounts from U.S. tax authorities.

Bloomberg reports :

U.S. customers had 32,940 secret accounts containing cash and 20,877 accounts holding securities, according to the Justice Department lawsuit filed today in federal court in Miami. U.S. customers failed to report and pay U.S. taxes on income earned in those accounts, which held about $14.8 billion in assets during the middle of this decade, according to the court filing.

“At a time when millions of Americans are losing their jobs, their homes and their health care, it is appalling that more than 50,000 of the wealthiest among us have actively sought to evade their civic and legal duty to pay taxes,” John A. DiCicco, acting assistant attorney general in the Justice Department’s tax division, said in a statement.

UBS does not intend, however, to just roll over and provide the IRS with these details according to the article :

UBS said in a statement that it expected today’s filing.

“UBS believes it has substantial defenses” to the U.S. attempt to enforce the summonses and will “vigorously contest” the case, the bank said in the statement. The bank’s objections are based on U.S. laws, Swiss financial privacy laws, and a 2001 agreement between UBS and the IRS, according to the statement.

The article goes on to quote a professor for saying that this could indeed mean the end of the famed and heavily guarded Swiss banking secrecy for which Switzerland is so well-known, at least in certain parts of the world including the EU and the US :

Roy Smith, a finance professor at New York University’s Stern School of Business and a former Goldman Sachs Group Inc. partner, said a UBS loss in the case would be “very bad news” for Swiss banks.

Swiss Secrecy

“If you get to the point where you’re able to get information on 52,000 accounts just because they exist, not because of evidence of a crime, you’ve gotten rid of Swiss banking secrecy forever,” Smith said. “If the European Union follows suit, it’ll virtually be the end of secret accounts in Switzerland.”

The Washington Post puts another interesting angle on the story by including the former UBS banker, Bradley Birkenfeld, into the case :

The U.S. government has been probing UBS with help from sources such as a former UBS banker, Bradley Birkenfeld, who last year pleaded guilty to helping a California real estate mogul evade millions of dollars of taxes. Birkenfeld told investigators that UBS personnel went to elaborate lengths to help U.S. clients stash money in secret Swiss accounts.

 The investigation led to the indictment in November of a top UBS executive. The U.S. government has used internal bank documents to accuse UBS management of conspiring to deprive the U.S. Treasury of tax revenue.

In Wednesday’s settlement, UBS admitted that it schemed to defraud the United States, in some cases by helping clients set up offshore companies to hide the true ownership of their Swiss accounts. The operation allegedly generated hundreds of millions of dollars of profit for UBS. The government said it demanded smaller penalties from UBS than it could have in consideration of the international financial crisis.

At the moment UBS admittedly seems to have the upper hand in this unwinding case with only around 300 names and clients having so far been surrendered to the IRS and with UBS arguing a very strong case against the US law suit reference its Swiss banking laws, but as The Washington Post article concludes that this in itself may mean the biggest blow to Swiss banking secrecy ever and hence its image to world-wide clients who will wonder who is next in line :

By targeting information based in the United States, the IRS obtained the names of about 323 clients who held UBS accounts in both the United States and Switzerland and transferred money between them, IRS agent Daniel Reeves said in a separate court filing yesterday.

The greatest blow to Swiss bank secrecy thus far may be UBS’s decision to close the secret Swiss accounts of its American clients, forcing depositors to move their money and sending a message that customers can’t rely on the bank to keep their assets hidden.

Investment Banking, Investment Management, US Investments Bloomberg, IRS, Swiss banking sector, UBS, US Government, Washington Post, Wealth Management

Mr. R. Allen Stanford

Just when the financial world is trying to come to grips with the unravelling Madoff financial scandal and Ponzi scheme, another major financial scandal is breaking ! This time also from The US in the form of Texas billionaire R. Allen Stanford whose Stanford Financial Group is now under close scrutiny by the SEC and they have now Mr Stanford and two other persons with major financial fraud to the amount of 8 billion US$.

Forbes.com reports :

Hoping to halt what it called “a fraud of shocking magnitude that has spread its tentacles throughout the world,” the Securities and Exchange Commissioncharged billionaire R. Allen Stanford and other executives at his massive financial services company, Stanford Financial Group, with operating a multibillion-dollar fraudulent investment scheme.

In a complaint filed early Tuesday in U.S. District Court in Dallas, the SEC alleged Antigua-based Stanford International Bank (SIB) fabricated investment returns in order to market and sell high-yielding certificates of deposits.

Certainly the method Mr Stanford and his partners went about their scheme has strong resemblances with Mr Madoff’s as the Forbes article highlights :

The complaint charged SIB with selling approximately $8 billion of CDs to investors by promising improbable and unsubstantiated interest rates.

The bank falsely claimed it was able to pay high interest rates because of its unique investment strategy, which allowed it to achieve double-digit returns on its investments for the past 15 years, according to the complaint.

Earlier Tuesday federal agents raided Stanford Financial Group’s offices in Houston. A sign hanging outside the office reads: “Now under management of a receiver.”

The SEC says it has frozen Stanford’s assets. He had no comment.

LA Times also looks  into Mr. Stanford’s “”unique investment strategy”" :

“Stanford and the close circle of family and friends with whom he runs his businesses perpetrated a massive fraud based on false promises and fabricated historical return data to prey on investors,” said Linda Chatman Thomsen, director of the SEC’s enforcement division. “We are moving quickly and decisively in this enforcement action to stop this fraudulent conduct and preserve assets for investors.”

The SEC called Stanford’s promises of high-interest returns on his bank’s certificates “improbable and unsubstantiated.” The 25-page complaint filed in federal court in Dallas cast doubt on Stanford’s claims of a “unique investment strategy” that allowed the bank to achieve double-digit returns on its investments over the last 15 years.

The US investigation will most likely be complicated by the fact that Mr Stanford’s entity is domiciled in Antigua but that will not deter the SEC from pursuing the case according to LA Times :

It wasn’t immediately clear how much of the Stanford empire would be subject to the SEC action. Federal investigators raided his Houston offices and shut them down, but much of the financial services group is based abroad, primarily on the tiny Caribbean island of Antigua, part of the two-island country of Antigua & Barbuda.

Stanford Group is regulated and audited by the Financial Services Regulatory Commission of Antigua & Barbuda. Commission Chairman Leroy King told Reuters news service Tuesday that he hadn’t initiated any special probe of Stanford’s operations because the commission hadn’t received any complaints from island citizens.

“We have no credible information coming to us to say that they are not sound,” King said.

However, news agencies later reported a run on the Bank of Antigua, a Stanford entity that was not named in the SEC complaint.

Stanford’s whereabouts were unknown. He has homes in Texas, Antigua & Barbuda and the U.S. Virgin Islands. A duty officer for the U.S. Marshals Service declined to say whether a warrant had been issued for Stanford’s arrest or whether the billionaire had been taken into custody.

Stanford Financial Group has offices in 14 U.S. cities in addition to its operations in the Caribbean.

Neither Brian Bertsch, a spokesman for Stanford Group, nor Rose Romero, the SEC’s Fort Worth regional director, responded to The Times’ inquiries about what authority the U.S. financial watchdog might wield over Stanford’s foreign-based assets.

Ironically, Stanford Group issued a calming letter to its investors in December 2008 amidst the height of the Madoff scandal according to LA Times :

In December, Stanford Group initiated a monthly newsletter to investors to calm their concerns over world markets and the failure of Madoff’s alleged $50-billion Ponzi scheme.

“We want our depositors to know that SIBL had no direct or indirect exposure to any of Madoff’s investments,” Stanford’s 30,000 clients were told. “Just as the bank had no direct or indirect exposure to the securitized debt or subprime meltdown.”

Where this breaking scandal ends no one knows but the timing could not have been worse for the US and its struggling financial markets and scene with investor confidence already at an all-time low. This blog will monitor this case even though this one is a mere US$ 8 billion !

Equity Investment, Investment Company, Investment Fund, Investment Management, US Investments Madoff Scandal, Ponzi scheme, R. Allen Stanford, The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)

This author was amazed to read that UBS of all banks were voted Forecaster of the Year by MarketWatch given the fact that UBS has been one of the biggest losers of the Credit Crunch and also caused massive losses for its investors.

MarketWatch reports on their recently released results:

U.S.-based economists at two Swiss banks took top honors in MarketWatch’s forecasting contest, MarketWatch announced Monday.

A team of economists at Credit Suisse led by chief economist Neal Soss had the most accurate forecasts of economic data released in December among 44 economists surveyed, winning its third Forecaster of the Month award.

And the team at UBS led by chief economist Maury Harris had the most accurate forecasts over the course of 2008, winning the team’s second Forecaster of the Year award in the past three years. Harris and O’Sullivan have won five monthly contests, including this past September’s. They also garnered the full-year title in 2006.

Is it not a fair question to ask then : How could things go so bad if they could see it coming ?

How it all works, Investment Banking, Investment Company, Investment Management MarketWatch, UBS, UBS credit crunch & executive bonuses

Warren Buffett

Times are hard and the markets are down again. Investors are gripped by fear of what 2009 will bring after a disastrous 2008 and most have bearish outlooks for major economies and markets alike. US job figures as of yesterday, which revealed that 693,000 people lost their jobs in the run up to Christmas, are making economists now expect Friday’s payroll figures to show that more than 700,000 people lost their jobs last month.

Obama has recently described the US economy as “very sick” and predicts the situation to worsen in 2009 and most agree with him.

One person, however, seems to be having the time of his life (at least since the 1970s when he was very gung-ho as well in the midst of a major economic global crisis) : He is not surprisingly Warren Buffett, Billionaire investor and chairman & CEO of  Berkshire Hathaway.

The shares of Berkshire Hathaway may have dropped 32 percent in 2008, making it the worst performance in more than three decades, but Mr Buffett has remained positive and very aggressive which one of his famous quotes also underlines :

“I will tell you how to become rich. … Be fearful when others are greedy. Be greedy when others are fearful.”

Yes stocks are cheap right now after their dismal performance in 2008 year and hence Buffett would argue that they offer a great buying opportunity, but others remain sceptical and see further losses and drops in stock prices.

So is Warren Buffett right to be in a buoyant buying mood ?

This posts looks into what others have to say about this.

Jim Mueller of Fool.comis impressed with Buffett’s track record and his ability to spot a good buying opportunity on the back of dismal market conditions:

Of course, past performance is no guarantee of future returns, but take another look at that quote above. Then read this one, also from Buffett, from his 1990 letter to shareholders:

“The most common cause of low prices is pessimism — some times pervasive, some times specific to a company or industry. We want to do business in such an environment, not because we like pessimism but because we like the prices it produces. It’s optimism that is the enemy of the rational buyer.”

Were you one of those who checked the table above when I told you the date of that quote? The man knows what he’s talking about.

You demand proof? In October 1990, just as bearish sentiment was peaking at 48%, Buffett revealed that he had upped his position in Wells Fargo to just shy of 10% of the company. In the following 12 months, while the market returned a “mere” 29%, that one investment returned 123%. In the five years following that bearish peak, it returned 290% or 31.3% average per year! And that doesn’t even include the dividends. He still owns about 7% of the company.

Mueller  continues to emphasize that with today’s major bearish market and outlook, Buffett has yet again proven to be good to his word and started the year by buying major positions in integrated oil giant ConocoPhillips  and also upped his position in health-benefits manager WellPoint and he concludes on the same note:

Will those work out for him? Given his record, probably. However, the question you’ve got to ask yourself today isn’t “What is Warren doing?”

Rather, it’s “Am I going to be greedy?”

I hope you’ll answer “yes” to that question.

CNBC’s Alex Crippen has a story  on Morningstar StockInvestor and its editor Paul Larson who recently named Mr Buffett as their CEO of the year despite some rather controversial and bad timing decisions by Mr Buffett during the latter half of 2008 :

Morningstar StockInvestor editor Paul Larson recounts Buffett’s “perceived mistakes” of recent months, including Berkshire’s big put option contracts on stocks, investments in General Electric [GE  16.11    -0.75  (-4.45%)   ] and Goldman Sachs [GS  84.50    -4.21  (-4.75%)   ], and Buffett’s October call to buy U.S. stocks.  “With the market taking a sharp turn for the worse in late October and again in November, clearly the timing was not the best on these particular bullish actions.”

But, writes Larson, “We do not view these as any reason to lose confidence in Buffett’s abilities, either as an investor or corporate manager.”

He argues that worries about the option contracts are overblown and points out that even though the GE and Goldman warrants are underwater right now, Berkshire gets a 10 percent annual return on its $8 billion worth of preferred shares in the two companies, no matter what their common stocks do.

The article goes on to stress how impressed Larson is by Buffett’s gung-ho attitude and not least ability to steer Berkshire away from risky derivatives and excessive leverage :

“By practicing prudence and patience earlier in the decade, Berkshire was in a position to put large amounts of capital to work in 2008. In other words, rather than blowing its ammunition hunting squirrels a few years ago, Berkshire has been able to shoot the proverbial elephants now walking by.”

Morningstar’s bottom line:

“Beyond creating a company that treats common shareholders with the utmost fairness and respect, one needs only to look at the long-term value created at Berkshire Hathaway to see why Buffett deserves the award. Since taking the helm of the sleepy textile business 44 years ago and turning it into arguably the strongest conglomerate on the planet, Buffett and his managers have grown the book value per A share from $19 to just over $77,500, as of Sept. 30. This translates to a 20.7% annualized increase in book value since 1965, versus a mere 9.6% annualized return in the S&P 500 (including dividends) over the same time period.”

Seattle Times’ Hugh Son quotes  a senior investor for saying he does not believe that despite some recentquestionable investment decisions by Berkshire Hathaway that Mr Buffett has far from lost his magic touch:

“Buffett has the opportunity to do what he does best, which is acquire new companies at prices that have him licking his lips,” said Frank Betz, a partner at Carret Zane Capital Management, which holds Berkshire shares. “I don’t think Mr. Buffett is bummed out at all.”

This seems indeed to be the general sentiment of analysts and observers and despite his 78 years of age and a negative performance during 2008, one really should not write Buffett of as one of the most important and skilled investors of our time,  in fact it may be a very good idea to by into his Berkshire Hathaway now, that is if you can afford such a thing.

Finally, if you are interested to follow investment guru Warren Buffett here is a great site to bookmark - it also features all Buffett’s famous quotes in its headline so check it out - Warren Buffett Post

Equity Investment, Investment Company, Investment Management, Investment opportunities, US Investments Berkshire Hathaway, ConocoPhillips, Financial crisis, Stock markets, Warren Buffet

There is no denying that the otherwise supreme and untouchable Swiss Banking sector has suffered the worst blow to its name and status in 2008 where the Credit Crunch exposed clear cracks in the foundation of what the world perceived to the best and strongest, and most well-protected banking sector in the world.

This post looks into some of these cracks and tries to look ahead for Switzerland’s traditional flagship and main revenue earner.

Business Standard quotes Philipp Hildebrand, the vice-chairman of the Swiss National Bank’s governing board for saying that the recent liquidity injections into the Swiss banking sector, and notably the USD 60 billion aid package and deal with UBS, has had positive effects but warns that the crisis is far from over :

The liquidity situation at UBS, in particular, has stabilised, he said.

“Nevertheless, further losses cannot be ruled out in view of the difficult market conditions,” Hildebrand said.

“The situation remains serious, and the SNB will continue monitoring it closely together with the Swiss Federal Banking Commission and the Federal Department of Finance.”

The article continues to summarize the year for the two Swiss banking giants, UBS & Credit Suisse, and points out that even though Credit Suisse has fared better with smaller losses and write-offs than its big brother UBS, there are now signs that Credit Suisse too will be posting huge negative results in the comings quarters :

UBS, which posted billions of dollars in asset writedowns, was forced to accept a state rescue package in a bid to restore client confidence and stem asset withdrawals which reached a colossal 83.7 billion Swiss francs ($70.2 billion) in the third quarter.

Credit Suisse, Switzerland’s second biggest bank, has until now fared better than its peer UBS, with asset writedowns of about 12 billion Swiss francs.

But losses are beginning to pile up at the bank, with a warning of a 3.0 billion Swiss franc loss for the two months ending November following a 1.26 billion Swiss franc loss for the third quarter.

New York Timesthrows light on another low-profile yet renowned Swiss Private Bank, Geneva-based Union Bancaire Privée, who like UBS and other more publicly known Swiss banks,  have also been badly hit by the recent Madoff scandal and Ponzi Scheme :

Now, as the links between Bernard L. Madoffand elite private banks like Geneva-based Union Bancaire Privée emerge, this well-polished reputation has been tarnished by the $50 billion Ponzi schemethat Mr. Madoff has been arrested for and accused of running.

L’Affaire Madoff, as it has become known here and in Geneva, has cast an unwanted spotlight onto the normally shadowy world of private bankers in Switzerland and other cozy hiding places of offshore wealth, like the Cayman Islands and Luxembourg.

And while there are many Swiss victims in terms of total exposure, UBP is the best-known private bank to get hit, with $700 million of its clients’ money invested with Mr. Madoff.

The article continues to dig deep into this private bank giant’s relationship with Mr. Madoff and asks why they did not react as other institutions did when they supposedly got access to documents that should have raised red flags:

With assets of $125 billion and a client base of wealthy individuals, families and institutions that reach from Qatar to Uruguay to Russia and throughout Europe, it is one of Switzerland’s biggest pipelines for channeling client money into hedge funds worldwide.

About six years ago, that business, known as a fund of funds, began to rake in larger fees when it decided to set up a vehicle called M-Invest Ltd to funnel cash to Mr. Madoff’s firm.

Through this relationship, UBP claimed it was able to gain close insight into Mr. Madoff’s investment operations, through copies of trade tickets and an unusual degree of access granted by Mr. Madoff himself to UBP’s representatives, according to a confidential internal letter sent to investors on Dec. 17, obtained by The New York Times.

The memorandum, while seeking to reassure investors, could raise questions about why UBP, unlike others who claimed to have seen red flags, did not use its access to delve more deeply into the unusually consistent annual returns that Mr. Madoff’s funds were reporting.

According to the memo, “We have met with Bernard Madoff and various principals several times at Madoff’s office, twice within the last year, and have had numerous conversations in between.” The letter stated that several of UBP’s senior investment professionals met with Mr. Madoff in 2004 and 2007, and that UBP’s structured risk analysis unit “had a full review in 2006 and recently in 2008 with Madoff himself.”

UBS again made negative headlines for the Swiss banking sector and for European private banks in general with the recent case where The United States indicted UBS wealth management chief Raoul Weil in November, accusing him of helping Americans hide $20 billion from U.S. tax authorities, which many saw as a warning shot for banks who provide offshore services for wealthy clients :

Bradley Birkenfeld, a former UBS banker, has pleaded guilty to helping clients avoid U.S. taxes. On one occasion, he smuggled diamonds into the United States inside a toothpaste tube for a client, according to a grand jury indictment against him.

 

Weil, the highest-ranking UBS executive hit by the U.S. tax investigation, says he is innocent and has stepped aside to fight his case in court. UBS has in the meantime admitted that tax fraud occurred in a limited number of cases at the bank.

 

As a result of the case, banks inside and outside this landlocked nation are watching the UBS case unfold and rethinking how to do business with rich individuals.

 

“This does send the message to other banks: you have to get your house in order if you want to work with Americans and American residents,” said Stephanie Jarrett, a tax expert at law firm Baker & McKenzie.

And the Reuters article goes on to point out that there could be severe repercussions for the private banking industry in Lichtenstein, Jersey and Switzerland if the UBS tax probe case unfolds negatively :

Now, thanks to a U.S. tax probe into Swiss bank UBS (UBSN.VX)and other pressure, a quiet revolution is brewing in the $7 trillion world of offshore banking, as banks realize that holding untaxed money can ultimately sting them.

 

“Some countries have decided that they want to make it more difficult for Switzerland, Liechtenstein and other centers to serve their client base,” said Prince Max, who oversees about $80 billion in client assets at LGT Group, owned by Liechtenstein’s ruling family.

It will be interesting to see if the previously untouchable Swiss banking sector, and not least their many formerly reputed Private Banks, can make a come back in 2009 and beyond to win back the many unhappy private and institutional clients who suffered major losses in 2008 ?

This blog will monitor the development.

Equity Investment, Investment Banking, Investment Fund, Investment Management Credit Suisse, Madoff Scandal, Ponzi scheme, Private banking, Swiss banking sector, UBS

Key commodities such as Gold and Silver both had a volatile 2008 with gold doing better overall than silver. Analysts are now trying to predict where gold is headed and the views differ quite a lot from UBS’ prediction that gold will hit USD 700 in 2009to Citigroup’s overly optimistic prediction that gold will reach USD 2,000 in 2009.

Volatility has always surrounded these two precious commodities with silver showing the greatest ups and downs in value, but while most analysts focus on gold and its future prices, some experts are pointing to gold’s baby brother silver as the commodity to consider for investment in 2009.

This post looks into what some experts and analysts have to say about gold and silver prices for the new year.

Christopher Barker of The Motley Fool is emphasizing the fact that the historical average ration of 1:20 between gold and silver prices is not in place at the moment pointing to, he argues, that silver could be in for a bigger surge in prices than gold:

Sources like Peter Schiff and Citigroup have suggested that gold may reach $2,000 per ounce in 2009. Legendary investor Jim Rogers recently declared his intention to exit all dollar holdings. Personally, while I also see gold reaching $2,000 at some point during this historic run, I am not convinced it will come quite that quickly. The ratio of gold to silver prices stands near 80-to-1, suggesting silver may also have a nice recovery in store as it trends back toward an historical average ratio of about 20-to-1.

Barker remains optimistic overall on both gold and silver price development for 2009 and also points to the fact that lately in Q4 some mining companies’ shares increased by more than 100% and would hence also be potential investment targets besides the metals themselves, however, he offers here a word of warning:

Mining is a capital-intensive industry, so a constrained global credit market is forcing many companies to scale back exploration and development activity in attempts to shore up balance sheets. Combined with a nasty dip in base metal prices, which are generally key to keeping gold and silver mining costs within economical ranges, these challenges create something of a minefield. Despite my bullish outlook for the precious metals themselves, I still see the outright failure of some mining companies as a distinct possibility, and I suspect some uninspiring fourth-quarter earnings results could challenge shares in the near term. For the quality miners, though, I believe that substantial upside leverage to higher gold and silver prices awaits.

My Foolish criteria for selecting quality miners include:

• A close examination of the balance sheet. Reasonable debt ratios may be acceptable in cases where production growth is a given, but otherwise a debt-free miner like Goldcorp (NYSE: GG) looks enticing.
• Critical mass. Some junior miners may ultimately enjoy the greatest leverage of all, but their smaller scale often reduces flexibility in adapting to challenging conditions. Tread carefully for now!
• Operations in geo-politically stable regions. Agnico-Eagle takes the cake.
• Low-cost of production. Yawanna check out Yamana for gold, and Silver Wheaton for silver. The quality of ore grades are a factor as well.

His conclusion, however, is very optimistic on behalf of precious metals:

Until the fundamental outlook for the U.S. dollar reverses course, I maintain that gold and silver investments offer the best safe-haven characteristics available anywhere. If a 2% gain for gold outperformed the equity markets in 2008, imagine what a truly precious bounce in 2009 could achieve.

Lawrence Williams of Mineweb.com is also cautiously optimistic on behalf of both gold and silver for 2009 but points out that for silver the complexity of its price development and dependants is far greater than for gold as silver has multiple usage:

Silver is a bit of a different animal, but does tend to ride on gold’s coat tails – but in a far more volatile manner given its production patterns and industrial usage.  Unlike gold, silver fell back 57 percent from peak to trough and will likely continue to be far more volatile than gold in the months ahead.  If gold does surge, then silver may do even better in percentage terms.  If gold falls there is the possibility silver will do even worse.

To an extent silver as a commodity is a bit of a red herring – or it is at the moment.  While more and more uses are found for the metal in emerging communications and bacterological fields and supply may well be primarily dependent on byproduct output from zinc and lead mining, where huge closures are taking place, the main drivers remain in its position as an investment vehicle and in the jewellery market.  Price movements remain very much tied to gold and it is in the performance of the latter where sliver’s potential for price increase, or decrease, really lies – despite the views and the protestations of the true silver bulls who are, perhaps even more evangelical in their outpourings than the gold protagonists.  If you have a positive  view on gold, then buy silver and hang on for the roller coaster ride could be the path here!

His 2009 predictions for gold and silver are very much in sync with those of Mr. Barker:

Overall I suppose one should be cautiously optimistic on the outlook for gold and silver in the year ahead.  Gold fundamentals look relatively strong and prices seem to be well supported above the $740 mark which should limit the downside risk.  Upwards the sky would seem to be the limit, but the reality is that gold has moved pretty cautiously through the recent financial quagmire and is likely to continue to do so.  $1,000 gold still has to be in prospect sometime in 2009, and once reached may well be maintained, particularly if the dollar starts to fall again.

Predictions from Golfseek.com also speak of increasing gold prices for 2009 but they are even more optimistic about silver:

        Silver will do very well – Silver has been a neglected and almost abandoned orphan in the economic storm.  The common wisdom says that economic activity is slowing, so industrial metals like silver will have reduced consumption and should be sold.  Past readers of the Optimist will attest that my views are neither common nor wisdom, so I am free to take a contrary approach.  Just as fewer houses being constructed reduce the need for copper wires, and fewer automobiles being built reduce the need for platinum in catalytic converters, the quantity of silver needed for many industrial uses is also likely to be reduced.  In the case of silver, however, the reduction in industrial demand is likely to be more than offset by a greater reduction in the supply of silver which is produced as a by product of base metals mining.  As base metal prices and production plummet from reduced economic activity, the sharply reduced supply factor should provide a positive tone for silver prices.  Also, if the odd silver sidestep cycle continues in 2009, then it is possible that the price of silver could target $25 per ounce in the next 12 to 16 months.

Gold will hit a new high price – Gold continues to track the expanding “cornucopia” channel I constructed two and a half years ago.  As the current credit crunch dissolves into higher inflation, I think it reasonable to expect gold to once again race to the top of that channel.  I am hopeful that the U.S. dollar price of gold will approach $1,250 within the next 12 to 16 months.

Commodityonline.com quotes David Morgan for saying that whilst silver is doing quite well, it is not performing as well as gold:

Both silver and gold markets have become victims of the credit crisis, which actually started in August of 2007. Things really got going to the downside on the annual rollover of August 2008 and that has continued. If you look at gold irrespective of the dollar—in other words, vis-à-vis other currencies—it’s doing quite well. And if you look at gold in U.S. dollars vis-à-vis any other market such as the Dow Jones, the S&P 500 or the oil market, it’s actually holding up better than most markets.

Silver is doing not as well as gold, but better than the base metals. And since silver is really an industrial metal and a monetary metal, you would expect it to perform during recessionary times as it has—better than the base metals but not as good as gold.

Mr Morgan, who is the founder of the Silver-Investor.com and publisher of the Morgan Report, 
 also subscribes to silver having a far greater potential in terms of price increases than gold and his reasoning is:

 I believe that the supply of silver is so small relative to the population base that it won’t take much new buying to carry silver far, far higher. You have to remember that silver hit $50 an ounce in 1980 and there was roughly four times more silver available above ground than now. Also, the money supply was about one-seventh the size that it is now. So if you use those facts—that the silver supply, instead of being 2 billion ounces of fine bullion, is less than 500,000 ounces and that the money supply, M1, is about six or seven times greater—that shows you a high, high potential that silver could certainly go up.

This blog will curiously follow the prices of both gold and silver but from the above experts’ opinions it seems very likely that whilst gold will remain an attractive investment, silver may be an even better one !

Alternative investments, Gold Investment, Investment Management commodities, David Morgan, Gold investments, precious metals, silver

For more than two decades, software giant Microsoft has gone from strength to strength and has despite its obvious failure to get into the online business sphere and take on Google, managed to grow its revenues and profits at a staggering rate.

2008, however, proved to be a bad year for Microsoft in some of its key areas : The failed and much debacled Yahoo! take-over fiasco and its Vista OS failure rang amongst the most notable headlines for Microsoft who is now facing the prospect for the first time of not having their founder, Bill Gates, working at the company as he retires to run his charity organisation with his wife.

While analysts and experts disagree on the state of this giant and how it will fare in 2009 and beyond they do seem to agree that for CEO Steve Ballmer there lies a very challenging year ahead for Microsoft.

This post looks into some of the experts’ opinions and also what exactly lies ahead for Microsoft in 2009.

Shane O’neill of Networkworld.com highlights the obvious areas where Microsoft got it very wrong but is also quick to point out that not everything that Microsoft did during 2008 was a disaster, in fact the contrary :

Equity Investment, Investment Management, Online Investment, US Investments Google, Microsoft, Operating system, search advertising, software

Year end is approaching fast and it is common to find analysts and experts trying to predict what will happen in the coming year. Not less so this year after what has been a very turbulent and difficult year with several large economies sliding into full blown Recession, the stock markets globally having lost in excess of a third of their value, some more, the property market having collapsed in major countries and several large commercial companies being threatened with bankruptcy and closure. Not to mention the financial sector which has seen some astounding collapses or bail outs in the last minute by governments.

One company, SAXO Bank who is a leading player in the Forex market, has made it a kind of tradition to come out with what they boldly call: “10 Outrageous Claims 2009″ which in their own analysts words is :

(A) thought provoking and controversial “Black Swan” exercise (that) always factors in the less likely scenarios as perceived by the market.

The primary reason for doing this “Black Swan” exercise every year is to counter-balance human psychology, which is usually skewed towards optimism. We tend to be somewhat more pessimistic in our Yearly Outlook than the average analyst in the market, and believe that it is important for the investor to always factor in the less likely scenarios (as perceived by the market). Please keep in mind that this is more of a thought exercise than a set of outright predictions – we do not consider the chances are better than 50-50 for all of these claims.

So what are the Danes’ predictions of doom and gloom then ? Well is has everything from Revolutions to Crude Oil falling belwo US$ 25 to the Euro falling below 1 US$ - here is a list of the 10 Outrageous Claims as summarized by Michael Haltman of Gather.com :

1. An Iranian Revolution
2. Crude dropping to $25 a barrel
3. The S&P 500 falling to 500 (880 now)
4. Italy dropping the Euro
5. Australian dollar slumping versus the Yen
6. The Euro falling below $1.00
7. Chinese GDP growth falling to 0% (current estimates range from 6-10%)
8. Eastern European Forex Pegs to Fail
9. Sharp declines in commodities prices
10. Yen could become the Asian currency peg over the dollar

MarketWatch quotes one of their team leaders from their Research & Strategy Division, David Karsbol, Chief Economist at Saxo Bank:

It is not even outrageous to call this the worst economic crisis ever. We have, regrettably, been rather precise in almost all predictions from last year. What used to be outrageous now seems to be the norm”, says Karsbol.

“In a year when markets and economies have fluctuated more widely than ever before nothing seems out of the ordinary or impossible. We believe that 2009 will be equally unpredictable and therefore have made ten outrageous predictions largely focusing and what might happen to global indices and currencies. The good thing is, overall, we predict 2009 will be a turning point because it can’t get much worse” says Karsb0l.

“In 2008 the S&P 500 has fallen well over 25% below its 1182 high of 2007, world oil prices got close to the predicted high of $175, and UK growth has turned negative. Who knows which of our 2009 forecasts will prove to be right but judging by previous years some of them most certainly will,” he adds.

     “When it comes to the future, there are three kinds of people: those who let it happen, those who make it happen, and those who wonder what happened.” (John M. Richardson, Jr)

“The best thing about the future is that it comes only one day at a time.” (Abraham Lincoln)

     “Stop acting as if life is a rehearsal. Live this day as if it were your last. The past is over and gone. The future is not guaranteed.” (Wayne Dyer)

My interest is in the future because I am going to spend the rest of my life there” (Charles F. Kettering)

He who laughs last laughs longest

 

Currency, Equity Investment, How it all works, Investment Banking, Investment Company, Investment Management, Investment News, Investment Services 2009 Forecast, Australian Dollar, Commodity prices, Crude Oil, Euro, Iran, SAXO Bank, Yen